will you be my Anne Boleyn
will you offer up your head
eyes blind one fine morning
no more to love, no more to bed
will you offer up your head
it is the sacrifice I crave
no more to love, no more to bed
your bed, beloved, a marble grave
it is the sacrifice I crave;
just this bauble, bright and frail.
your bed, beloved, a marble grave;
wet-clay-cold and tallow-pale
just this bauble, bright and frail.
still upon this bed of straw
wet-clay-cold and tallow-pale
at the whim of a padishah
still upon this bed of straw
will you offer up your head
at the whim of a padishah
will you be my Anne Boleyn
it is not clear here who painted the painting--where you got it from and as i've said the description as well. i know it's incredibly easy to find an image like this, but you might be surprised how much research has been done in regards to that painting. many scholars believe it is one of many paintings said to be anne boleyn, that are actually portraits done long after her death by people who'd never seen her. there are many questions as to whether any extant portraits are actually based actually upon how she looks. there is much question as to what she actually looked like.
sorry to go on and on, but artists treat art as sacred in regards to theft and reproduction without credit, but the same is not done for history in this community...
I can't see how this could be construed as theft; it's clear fair-use reference. If the artist was known, if it were by Holbein, for example, perhaps (and even then, it's for citation purposes). In this case, sorry, I don't see it.
however, i have slight issue with the description beneath the poem. it appears to be an essay written by one of the collaborators with link to widipedia that is not obvious. i think it would be much more appropriate to state at the beginning that this description was taken almost verbatim from wiki. if it weren't the internet i would expect footnotes and quotation marks, etc.
Well, the comment is not the art and I don't have written it. If someone wants to make that assumption, I can't really stop that. And since I do reference wikipedia as the source, I don't see a problem.
But we are on the internet, and this explanation is there for people who may not know who she is. It is the footnote.